ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Clinical application of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is now more commonly being utilized in cardiopulmonary resuscitation to offer immediate evaluation of cardiac motion and to direct management. However, the evidence is still heterogeneous. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to assess the clinical utility of PoCUS in terms of its effects on resuscitation outcomes. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Studies on adult patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) were included following predefined Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study Design (PICOS) criteria. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and appraised quality using Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for randomized trials and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess robustness and the presence of publication bias was evaluated. Results: Pooled results of all included studies involving patient populations showed that PoCUS during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increased the rate of the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (43% Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that performing PoCUS during CPR is associated with better clinical outcomes, including increased ROSC and survival to hospital discharge, further highlighting the potential advantages of PoCUS to assist in cardiac arrest management as well as making clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.