ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
Addressing Cardiopulmonary Risk in COPD: A Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion Framework for the United States Healthcare System.
Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent and devastating condition responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality in the United States (US). Although the burden of cardiopulmonary (CP) comorbidity in COPD is increasingly known, CP risk remains frequently under-recognized and suboptimally managed in routine clinical practice. Definitions of CP risk in COPD vary across the literature and clinical settings. CP risk may be broadly defined as the risk of serious respiratory and/or cardiovascular events in patients with COPD, including COPD exacerbations, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure decompensation, arrhythmia, and death. While current clinical guidelines recognize comorbidity, there remain no clear protocols for screening, risk assessment, or a coordinated multidisciplinary approach to address the CP risk in patients with COPD. To address these gaps, a multidisciplinary expert panel developed consensus-based guidance through an iterative process incorporating an expert-led narrative review supported by targeted desk searches alongside multiple rounds of expert input. This paper identifies critical gaps in the management of CP risk among patients with COPD in the US and outlines actionable steps towards improvement of care. Actionable recommendations include encouraging earlier screening and risk assessment to identify patients at risk of exacerbations and improving patient access to multidisciplinary teams, prompting earlier initiation or optimization of evidence-based treatment. Furthermore, implementation of fully coordinated treatment strategies through primary care settings and increasing the use of preventative strategies in the clinic such as spirometry, vaccination, and smoking cessation are recommended. By shifting to proactive, multidisciplinary care, healthcare practitioners can better address the complex needs of patients with COPD to reduce their CP risk and improve individual and population-level outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.