Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42701433›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

From spatial maps to treatment decisions: a roadmap for integrating explainable AI with multi-omics to guide precision immunotherapy.

Mamoudou Hamadou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mamoudou HamadouDepartment of Biological Sciences, Biochemistry, Bioinformatics, and Therapeutic Innovations, Research Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Maroua, P. O. Box 814, Maroua, Cameroon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has fundamentally transformed oncology, yet durable clinical responses remain confined to a minority of patients, a therapeutic impasse that arises from the spatial complexity of the tumor microenvironment. Single-cell and spatial multi-omics now resolve this architecture at unprecedented resolution, while deep learning extracts prognostic signals from histopathology images. Yet these advances have not closed the translational gap, largely because black-box models, fragmented validation, and a lack of prospective interventional evidence prevent clinical adoption. Here, we argue that the strategic convergence of spatial multi-omics, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), and mechanism-guided clinical trial design will provide the definitive translational bridge between tissue architecture and therapeutic decision-making. We outline a roadmap in which interpretable spatial biomarkers, derived from concept-based XAI and counterfactual reasoning, are locked as assays, prospectively validated in biomarker-stratified trials, and evaluated under real-world conditions through federated learning. We highlight the necessity of community-wide benchmarking, mandatory sharing of code and spatial data, and the deliberate reporting of negative results to discipline the field. To operationalize this integration, we introduce the Spatial Immune Engagement Index (SIEI), a distance-weighted metric that quantifies the proximity of CD8

Indexed as

Biomarker-driven clinical trialsPrecision immuno-oncologySpatial immune engagement indexSpatial multi-omicsTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42701433
PMCPMC13545456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.