ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2026
Low bone density and post-operative outcomes following revision total shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low bone density (LBD) may increase complication risk following revision total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but the magnitude and time course of this risk in the revision setting have not been well characterized, with few studies reporting short-term or midterm outcomes. This study compared 90-day and 2-year outcomes after rTSA in patients with and without a documented diagnosis of LBD. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients from January 1, 2005, through February 1, 2024. LBD was defined by a documented diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision M80, M81, or M85.8) present at the time of the index revision. Adult patients undergoing rTSA with a diagnosis of LBD were matched to patients without such a diagnosis on demographics, comorbidities, and revision indication, so that documented LBD was the only variable differing between cohorts. Ninety-day post-operative outcomes and 2-year surgical outcomes were evaluated. Sub-group analyses assessed outcomes separately for osteoporosis and osteopenia cohorts. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: After matching, 1,495 patients per cohort were included. At 90 days, a diagnosis of LBD was associated with higher rates of periprosthetic fracture (7.2% vs. 5.2%; relative risk (RR) 1.37, Conclusion: A documented diagnosis of LBD is associated with higher rates of periprosthetic fracture following rTSA. Sub-group analysis suggests that this association is primarily driven by patients with osteoporosis, whereas osteopenia alone was not associated with increased fracture risk. These findings highlight the importance of bone health characterization when evaluating risk profiles in patients undergoing rTSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.