ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2026
The adult congenital heart disease collaborative care model: Improving access with a care delivery innovation.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a critical nationwide access gap for the care of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). In Hawaii, where there are only 2 ACHD cardiologists serving the broader state-wide healthcare system, at most 10% of ACHD patients receive specialty care. Our goal was to 1) design and implement a novel program structured to provide high-quality ACHD care to a large population of patients by a limited number of ACHD specialists; and 2) evaluate the preliminary impact of this program on ACHD specialty care clinic volume. Methods: We built a novel care delivery model wherein the University of Washington AIMS Psychiatric Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) is adapted to expand the reach of ACHD specialists via team-based care coordination and integration of adult cardiologists and primary care providers. To evaluate the impact on access, we compared clinic volume during the pilot implementation phase in April - May 2026, to the volume of patients seen during 2023. Results: Within 5 months of implementation, the ACHD CoCM average weekly clinic volume was 19.6 patients per 0.2 FTE ACHD cardiologist, compared to the traditional care model baseline of 10.5 ACHD patients. Conclusions: We launched a novel ACHD CoCM to improve access to high-quality ACHD care using carefully orchestrated care coordination and integration of primary treating providers, with preliminary data suggesting a ∼2-fold increase in specialty care clinic volume. We estimate with refinements this could ultimately expand each ACHD cardiologist's panel capacity by 3.3 times compared to a traditional care model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.