ArticleData in brief2026
TilapiaVisionDataset: Annotated image dataset for oreochromis niloticus.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision aquaculture requires automated monitoring systems capable of supporting fish management and production control in intensive farming environments. This article describes the TilapiaVisionDataset [3], a curated image dataset developed for object detection and counting of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) under controlled aquaculture conditions. The dataset was generated using an experimental water flume designed to simulate fish handling and monitoring scenarios, operating with a controlled water flow rate of 2700 L/h to reproduce realistic movement and interaction patterns while maintaining a low-stress acquisition procedure. Image acquisition was performed using a fixed high-resolution camera positioned above the flume, resulting in 8512 images with a spatial resolution of 1920 × 1080 pixels. A total of 63,004 fish instances were manually annotated using bounding boxes following the YOLO annotation format. The dataset includes scenes characterized by high stocking density, averaging 7.40 fish per frame, and incorporates common visual challenges observed in aquaculture environments, such as fish overlap, partial occlusion, motion variability, reflections, and illumination changes. To support machine learning workflows, the dataset is organized into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) subsets. The annotation structure and dataset organization enable direct compatibility with modern computer vision frameworks and object detection architectures, including single-stage and two-stage deep learning models. The dataset can be reused for the development, benchmarking, and validation of automated fish detection, counting, and monitoring systems. Potential applications include algorithm training, comparative evaluation of detection models, robustness analysis under dense biological scenarios, and research involving computer vision techniques applied to aquaculture monitoring environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.