ArticleNeurology. Education2026
Education Research: Neuropalliative Care Education: A National Survey of Neurology Program and Fellowship Directors.
Article in Neurology. Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Patients with neurologic disease have a variety of unmet palliative care needs. Both the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and Academy of Neurology have emphasized the need for neuropalliative care education in recent years. Neurology training programs have widely variable practices in teaching neuropalliative care. This study aims to characterize current practices in providing neuropalliative care education across graduate neurology training and to identify barriers to its delivery. Methods: We surveyed program directors (PDs) of neurology residency and fellowship training programs in the United States regarding their current methods of teaching neuropalliative care topics, perceived importance of these topics, relevant subspecialty resources, and perceived barriers to providing neuropalliative care education. Results: Our survey was emailed to 777 PDs and fellowship directors. In total, 118 responses were included in the analytic sample (response rate 15.2%). Program directors generally perceived neuropalliative care education as important, with a median rank of 7 of 10. 91% of adult neurology residency programs and 66% of fellowship programs included palliative care topics in their didactics curricula. Topics emphasized varied depending on the training program's subspecialty. Respondents highlighted barriers to implementing neuropalliative care training, including inadequate trainee and faculty time and lack of adequate teaching faculty. Discussion: Neurology training programs continue to exhibit considerable variability in palliative care education curricula. Although most programs reported a presence of palliative care in their institutions, variability exists in the amount of palliative care education taught, the topics emphasized, and the teaching methods. Notably, there is an opportunity for fellowship programs to increase the amount of neuropalliative care topics taught in their curricula. Neurology residency and fellowship directors may benefit from using existing neuropalliative care curricula to enhance this area of education, partnering with local non-neurology faculty to teach palliative topics, and integrating palliative care topics into subspecialty training.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.