Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42701380›Full record

ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

Mapping one health surveillance and networks for vector-borne disease prevention and control in Europe - A scoping review.

Godfred Amankwaa, Emmanuel S Tomude, Hermann Kam, Bethan V Purse, Jonathan Rushton, Mara Rocchi, Kayleigh Hansford, Jolyon M Medlock, Nicholas Johnson, Festus A Asaaga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Godfred AmankwaaUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB, United Kingdom.
Emmanuel S TomudeUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB, United Kingdom.
Hermann KamUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB, United Kingdom.
Bethan V PurseUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB, United Kingdom.
Jonathan RushtonRoslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Mara RocchiMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Penicuke, EH26 OPZ, UK.
Kayleigh HansfordMedical Entomology & Zoonoses Ecology, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, UK.
Jolyon M MedlockMedical Entomology & Zoonoses Ecology, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, UK.
Nicholas JohnsonVector Borne Diseases, Animal and Plant Health Agency Weybridge, Surrey KT17 3NB, UK.
Festus A AsaagaUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing vector-borne disease (re)emergence and geographic expansion, driven by environmental change, has been accompanied by growing calls for integrated or One Health surveillance approaches across the human, animal, and environmental health sectors. However, despite widespread advocacy and policy implementation, assessment of the extent to which existing systems achieve cross-sectoral integration remains unclear. There also remains limited evidence regarding existing surveillance capacities and the priorities of key actors within the surveillance ecosystem for transitioning to effectively integrated One Health (OH) surveillance systems, particularly in the context of vector-borne diseases. In this paper, we present the first evidence synthesis and mapping of the One Health Vector Borne Disease (VBD) surveillance systems landscape across Europe and the UK. We conducted targeted searches across Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library supplemented by grey literature and institutional searches across national surveillance organisations, which led to retrieval of 25 peer-reviewed papers and 72 distinct VBD surveillance systems. Of the 25 papers, overall profiling showed the OH VBD surveillance literature to be recent and predominantly quantitative, dominated by epidemiological and public health disciplines and concentrated in Northern/Western Europe. Also, there is limited use of evaluation frameworks for surveillance operationalisation and impact assessments across the reviewed literature. Analysis of the 72 surveillance systems showed that despite One Health rhetoric and government funding of over 90% of systems, there was persistent sectoral fragmentation, with systems skewed toward human health and animal health domains. Whilst institutional coordination existed in approximately 75% of systems, operational integration such as coordinated sampling and risk communication remained limited, and inclusion of the environmental health sector was underrepresented. We end by laying out opportunities for future research, with particular emphasis on the evaluation of effectiveness of surveillance and integration of social science and interdisciplinary perspectives. We also highlight opportunities for investing and funding the co-development and cross sectoral operationalisation for VBD surveillance and control.

Indexed as

Cross-sectoral integrationEuropeOne health surveillanceVector borne disease

Identifiers

PMID42701380
PMCPMC13545381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.