ArticleTrauma case reports2026
Point of care ultrasound in acute injuries of fingers and thumb.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute closed trauma to the long fingers and thumb presents a therapeutic challenge. Ultrasound refines clinical examination and enables optimal management. This study aims to assess the role of ultrasound in the management of acute closed trauma of the fingers and the thumb during post-emergency consultations. Method: Patients were re-evaluated within 15 days of their initial emergency visit. The evaluation combined a clinical examination and a standardized ultrasound assessment. Based on ultrasound findings, initial management was either confirmed or modified. The primary endpoint was the modification of initial management. Secondary endpoints included the evaluating of PRWE-Fr and QuickDASH scores and assessing of changes in the work absence duration. Results: Twenty-seven patients were evaluated, with a minimum clinical follow-up of three months. The mean age was 33 years. The thumb and the proximal interphalangeal joint were the most frequently affected fingers and joints, respectively. Ultrasound led to modifications in initial management in 77.8% of cases. Return to work was accelerated by an average of 5 days. At three months, mean PRWE-Fr and QuickDASH scores were 12.9 and 9.42, respectively. Conclusion: Ultrasound is an essential tool in the evaluation and management of acute trauma to the fingers and thumb. It is accessible, easy to perform, and non-irradiating, enhancing the clinical examination by the hand surgeon and enabling early therapeutic adjustments. Level of evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.