ArticlePublic health challenges2026
From Pap Test to Treatment: Assessing Facility Level Gaps in Cervical Cancer Care in Cape Town.
Article in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) 90‑70‑90 cervical cancer elimination targets aim for 90% human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates, 70% cervical screening rates, and 90% treatment rates for women with cervical disease. Although progress has been made in vaccination and screening in South Africa, less is known about treatment coverage following abnormal screening results. We focused on adherence to colposcopy clinic referrals among women with abnormal cytology. Methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of cervical cytology samples collected in 2022 from women attending 19 public healthcare facilities within a sub‑district of Cape Town. All cytology results reported as high‑grade intraepithelial lesions or invasive cervical carcinoma (HSIL+) were included. Colposcopy clinic attendance was defined as documented histological sampling within 24 months of diagnosis. Colposcopy clinic attendance rates (CCARs), test time intervals, and distance from referral hospital were calculated for each facility. Facilities were compared using percentile distributions, and distance to referral hospitals was analyzed as a potential spatial barrier. Results: Of 9,069 cervical samples, 556 (6.1%) were reported as HSIL+. Overall, 65.8% of women underwent histological sampling within 24 months. CCARs varied across facilities, ranging from 42.5% to 87.5% (mean 63.1%). Distance to referral hospitals (range 0-22 km; mean 10.8 km) showed no correlation with colposcopy clinic attendance. Conclusion: A substantial gap exists between current CCARs and the WHO treatment target. Variability among facilities, independent of geographic distance, suggests that health system factors, such as communication, recall, and referral processes, play a key role in treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.