ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2026
Outcomes reported in interventional studies for mild cognitive impairment: a scoping umbrella review to inform core outcome set development.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is currently no consensus on the most important treatment outcomes in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). As part of developing a core outcome set for MCI, we conducted a pragmatic scoping umbrella review to summarize outcomes reported in previous studies. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2023. Systematic and scoping reviews in English with ≥70% of studies describing at least one quantitative outcome of interventions involving adults with MCI were eligible. Verbatim outcomes were extracted from eligible papers within selected reviews. From 170 papers covering 153 studies from 42 reviews, 143 unique outcomes were identified. Global cognition was the only outcome reported by more than 50% of studies. Two-thirds of outcomes were reported by no more than three studies. Heterogeneous outcome reporting limits evidence synthesis and treatment evaluation. A core outcome set for MCI is warranted to standardize outcome reporting and offer stronger evidence for decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.