Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42701200›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2026

Characteristics of interprofessional collaboration between physicians and chiropractors within Québec multidisciplinary clinics: a mixed-methods study.

Marc-André Blanchette, Lilly Nguyen, Jean-Philip Hudon-Dionne, Geneviève Lavigne, Marie-Andrée Mercier, Jason W Busse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marc-André BlanchetteDépartement chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada. marc-andre.blanchette1@uqtr.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7172-7344
Lilly NguyenAdvisor, Ordre des chiropraticiens du Québec, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Jean-Philip Hudon-DionnePrivate practice, Vertebralis chiropratique, Rivière-du-Loup, Quebec, Canada.
Geneviève LavigneDépartement chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada.
Marie-Andrée MercierDépartement chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada.
Jason W BusseDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysician referral rates to chiropractors remain low in Quebec, and few multidisciplinary clinics include both professions. Yet these settings represent a unique opportunity to study interprofessional collaboration in musculoskeletal care. This study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to physician-chiropractor collaboration in multidisciplinary clinic settings, and to evaluate perceptions regarding the effectiveness of collaborative efforts on patient care.

methodsAn explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Between February and November 2024, quantitative data were collected via surveys of 23 chiropractors and 19 physicians practising in multidisciplinary clinics including both professions. Qualitative data were collected through a semi-structured focus group with seven chiropractors and individual semi-structured interviews with five physicians. Survey data were reported with descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsSurvey results indicated that nearly 70% of physicians referred patients to chiropractors at least monthly, driven primarily by established relationships or patient requests. Despite broadly positive mutual attitudes, physicians expressed concerns about the safety of cervical manipulation and professional liability. Chiropractors identified personal knowledge of other providers and physical proximity as the strongest enablers of collaboration with physicians, while clinical workload and patients' financial constraints were the primary barriers. Both professional groups attributed high value to interprofessional collaboration; most chiropractors and physicians reported that collaboration improved patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and overall quality of care. Qualitative analysis revealed three themes: perception, organization of care and services, and communication. Perceptual barriers included educational silos, historical professional tensions, and variability in chiropractic practices. Structural obstacles included out-of-pocket costs, exclusion from public care settings, and administrative burdens. Facilitators included personal experience with chiropractic care, co-location, clear referral pathways, and direct communication modalities.

conclusionsIn multidisciplinary clinic settings, interprofessional collaboration between physicians and chiropractors is valued and perceived as beneficial by both professional groups. Despite a favourable relational environment, collaborative practice remains heavily reliant on informal, relationship-driven interactions rather than embedded organizational structures. Our findings underscore the need for education, organizational integration, and communication infrastructure to improve interprofessional musculoskeletal care.

Indexed as

ChiropracticCooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsPhysiciansAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamQuebecReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesChiropracticDelivery of health care, IntegratedInterprofessional relationsPhysiciansPrimary health careReferral and consultation

Identifiers

PMID42701200
PMCPMC13546507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.