ArticleBMC psychology2026
Negotiating uncertainty and responsibility after a vestibular schwannoma diagnosis: a qualitative study of meaning-making and surgical decision-making.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA diagnosis of vestibular schwannoma (VS) confronts patients with complex treatment decisions under conditions of uncertainty. While previous research has focused on treatment outcomes, symptom trajectories, and predictors of treatment choice, less is known about how patients psychologically process the diagnosis and construct meaning before surgery. This study explored how patients experience uncertainty, regain agency, and negotiate responsibility during the preoperative period.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with twelve patients who underwent surgical resection of a VS within the previous five years. Interviews explored emotional, cognitive, and relational experiences following diagnosis and during treatment decision-making. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsFour interconnected themes described a process of reconstructing certainty and agency after diagnosis: (1) Diagnosis as biographical disruption, as patients experienced VS as a sudden event challenging their sense of normality, identity, and future expectations; (2) Meaning-making as an attempt to regain control, involving information-seeking, peer exchange, and reinterpretation of previous experiences; (3) Healthcare interactions as regulators of uncertainty, with communication quality, empathy, and consistency shaping confidence and emotional stability; and (4) Surgical decision-making as emotional, relational, and moral work, requiring patients to negotiate fear, trust, responsibility, and the burden of irreversible choices.
conclusionThe preoperative experience of patients with VS extends beyond symptom burden and treatment selection. Patients engage in complex processes of meaning-making and uncertainty management before deciding on treatment. Patient-centered care should integrate clear information with empathetic communication and support patients in navigating the emotional and moral dimensions of decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.