ArticleMycopathologia2026
Diagnostic Efficacy of Calcofluor White Staining Versus PAS and GMS Staining for Human Sporotrichosis in FFPE Specimens.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of calcofluor white (CFW) staining for sporotrichosis using archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens, compared with conventional histochemical stains.
methodsA total of 75 FFPE specimens collected between 2010 and 2023 from patients with culture- or sequencing-confirmed sporotrichosis cases were enrolled, with 70 specimens from non-fungal infection cases using as controls. Serial tissue sections were stained with CFW, periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), and Gomori methenamine silver (GMS) staining, respectively. The detection rates, diagnostic accuracy metrics, and storage duration effects were assessed.
resultsCFW staining yielded a fungal detection rate of 78.6% (59/75), which was significantly higher than those of PAS (38.6%, 29/75) and GMS (28.0%, 21/75) (χ
conclusionsFor archival FEPE specimens, CFW staining exhibits superior sensitivity and excellent specificity for sporotrichosis detection, which enables rapid diagnosis and effectively reduces the risk of misdiagnosis. Considering its technical simple operation, long-term stability, and being compatible with conventional histological examination, CFW staining serves as a valuable adjunctive diagnostic tool, particularly in sporotrichosis- endemic regions. Further prospective multicenter studies were required to validate its clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42701171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.