ArticleScientific reports2026
Iterative trocar-constrained laparoscope viewpoint search for enhanced surface coverage in 3D reconstruction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autonomy is a growing trend in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Autonomous systems require geometric information about the surgical environment, obtained from images and 3D reconstruction. The long-term goal of this work is to improve the completeness of endoscope-based 3D reconstruction by first creating a sparse 3D model and then guiding the laparoscope toward areas missing from the reconstruction. Guidance of rigid laparoscopes is challenging because the trocar, the entry point into the body, limits the degrees of freedom. Therefore, we propose an iterative geometric laparoscope viewpoint search approach, which considers the trocar point, the camera's field of view, and the robot's inverse kinematics. The validation, using ex vivo organ datasets containing prepared holes in a reconstructed point cloud, showed a success rate of 85%, in which viewpoints could be improved for the corresponding prepared holes. In contrast to existing methods applying interpolation to improve surface coverage, our method aims to cover feasible regions of interest with the camera. We achieved a reconstruction error of 1-2 mm with a relative improvement of the surface coverage of up to 6.3%. The computation time for the brute-force approach is 10 s on average per region of interest and could be reduced to 6 ms by applying a nonlinear optimization solver.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.