ArticleCommunications chemistry2026
Controllable molecular generation with fine-tuned flow-matching model.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Controllable molecular generation with fine-tuned flow-matching model.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional molecular generative models have emerged that produce de novo molecules both unconditionally and conditionally, e.g., within protein pockets. However, steering those models in a specific region of the chemical space that satisfies a set of desired properties remains challenging. In this study, we introduce a flexible reinforcement learning method for flow-matching based generative models, allowing the velocity field to be refined according to a user-defined reward function. In contrast to a pure conditional generation setup, where the set of conditions must be decided a priori, this framework allows fine-tuning of any unconditional or conditional model, reflecting a more realistic scenario where the target properties to be optimized often vary and are typically case-specific. This also enables joint optimization of continuous and discrete features in flow-matching models for the first time. Through extensive experiments across diverse optimization scenarios, we demonstrate that models trained with this strategy (agents) consistently outperform baseline approaches (priors) when evaluated against the target design criteria.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.