ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning-based multi-class misbehavior classification in fog-enabled vehicular ad hoc networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traffic collisions and congestion represent significant challenges within intelligent transportation systems (ITS). Consequently, a vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET) has been established. Numerous architectures have been incorporated into VANETs to manage the extensive data generated by vehicles. Collaboration with fog computing is vital, particularly for applications requiring real-time processing. In addition, there is a growing demand for advanced intrusion detection methods. These techniques are employed to identify the optimal response that the fog server should provide based on data received from a vehicle. As the network continues to grow, the amount of data needing analysis also increases. Thus, deep learning approaches become increasingly efficient. The requirement for feature selection is reduced when leveraging deep learning techniques. This work uses two deep learning-based misbehavior classification schemes for intrusion detection in VANETs: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). The vehicular data that the Roadside Units (RSUs) obtain is initially sent to the fog server for preprocessing and classification. This study suggests four classification methods, which include 4 LSTM, 2 LSTM-2 CNN, 3 CNN-1 LSTM, and 2 CNN-1 LSTM within two main classifiers. The first classifier uses them to classify each type of vehicle, while the second uses them to classify generic behavior categories. The results of the first classifier were higher than those of the existing work. The precision ranges from 94% to 98%. The recall ranges from 92% to 97%. The F1 scores range from 94% to 97%. The second classifier also scores the best results compared to other works. The precision, recall, and F1-score range from 99% to 99.66%. The time and space complexity are calculated for each model in each classifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.