Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42700932›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2026

Investigation of suspected pulmonary embolus - Imaging frequency and diagnostic yield over 10 years in a major UK teaching hospital.

Filipa M Mendes, Robert J B Goudie, Sarah L Cowan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filipa M MendesDepartment of Acute Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Robert J B GoudieMRC Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sarah L CowanDepartment of Acute Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: sarah.cowan@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary embolism (PE) is a condition with significant morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic imaging aims to identify patients with a PE so that they can receive anticoagulation. There is evidence, predominantly from the USA, that the number of diagnostic scans for PE has increased over time and the diagnostic yield (the percentage of positive scans) has decreased. There is limited evidence on whether this is also true in the UK.

aimTo describe the pattern of diagnostic imaging for acute PE and investigate whether there has been a change in the diagnostic yield over the last 10 years.

methodsAll adult patients who underwent either computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) or ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan as an investigation for acute PE at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) between 2015 and 2024 were included. This was a retrospective study using data extracted from the hospital electronic health record (EHR) system.

results25,672 scans were included, comprising 23,908 CTPA and 1,764 V/Q scans. The annual number of scans increased slightly over the time period, with an average increase of 1.2% per year (p < 0.05). The overall diagnostic yield was 17.0%, with no clear trend over time. There was also no clear trend in the proportion of subsegmental PE detected over time.

conclusionsThe overall number of scans performed and diagnostic yield for PE have remained relatively stable over the last decade. This is the largest study of its kind in the UK and, uniquely, also covers the entire timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath.

Indexed as

CTPADiagnostic yieldEHR dataPulmonary embolusV/Q scan

Identifiers

PMID42700932
PMCPMC13628237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.