ArticleHematology, transfusion and cell therapy2026
Hepatitis B virus reactivation risk in haploidentical versus matched donor transplantation: Impact of universal prophylaxis.
Article in Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatitis B virus reactivation is a serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, particularly in endemic regions. Patients with HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive serology represent an intermediate-risk group due to occult hepatitis B virus infection. This study evaluated hepatitis B virus reactivation risk in haploidentical versus matched donor hematopoietic cell transplantation and assessed the effectiveness of Taiwan's universal prophylaxis policy.
methodsA retrospective cohort study of 165 adult hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive status was conducted at China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan from 2010-2025. The incidence of hepatitis B virus reactivation was compared between the pre-prophylaxis (2010-February 2021) and post-policy implementation (March 2021-2025) periods. Univariable associations, clinical outcomes, and temporal patterns were analyzed.
resultsPre-prophylaxis, haploidentical recipients had higher reactivation rates (11.2%vs. 2.9%), but this did not reach statistical significance due to the small number of events (Odds ratio: 4.31; 95% CI: 0.67-37.55; p = 0.279). In the univariable analyses, hepatitis B virus reactivation was associated with chronic graft-versus-host disease (p = 0.001) and donor anti-HBs negativity (p = 0.001), with a median time to reactivation of 8.2 months.
conclusionIn this cohort, haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide was associated with a higher observed rate of hepatitis B virus reactivation than matched donor transplantation in HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive recipients, although this difference was not statistically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.