ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2026
Development of a Predictive Model for the Onset of Loneliness in Older Adults From the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Study of Geriatric Syndromes.
Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLoneliness is a rising public health concern among older Japanese adults. We aimed to construct a predictive model for loneliness onset among older adults and evaluate its predictive performance.
methodsA total of 4050 participants responded to our survey (mean follow-up period: 3.1 [range, 2.8-3.3] years). Of these, 1806 older adults (age ≥ 65 years) who were not lonely at baseline were included. Loneliness was assessed using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3). A score of ≥ 44 indicated the presence of loneliness at follow-up. Predictive models for the onset of loneliness were developed using 12 machine-learning algorithms. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analyses examined the contribution of baseline UCLA-LS information, model stability, and class imbalance handling.
resultsIn total, 421 respondents (23.3%) reported loneliness at follow-up. The XGBoost model achieved the highest AUC of 0.740 (0.705-0.776), with an accuracy of 0.631, sensitivity of 0.806, and specificity of 0.577. SHAP analysis indicated that baseline UCLA-LS items were among the most influential predictors. When all baseline UCLA-LS items were excluded, the test AUC decreased to 0.635. Ten-fold cross-validation showed a mean AUC of 0.742 ± 0.065 for the full XGBoost model.
conclusionXGBoost showed moderate discrimination for predicting 3-year loneliness onset. However, baseline UCLA-LS information contributed substantially to model performance, and external predictors alone showed modest discriminative ability. Further refinement and external validation are needed before implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.