ReviewReviews in medical virology2026
CRISPR-Engineered CAR-T Cell Therapy for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Review of Emerging Therapeutic Prospects.
Review in Reviews in medical virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains a clinically challenging malignancy, particularly in recurrent or metastatic disease where durable responses to chemoradiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade are limited. The viral aetiology of NPC provides a strong biological rationale for immune-based treatment; however, translation of chimaeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy into this solid tumour setting is constrained by poor tumour trafficking, antigen heterogeneity, limited surface accessibility of EBV latent antigens, T-cell exhaustion, and an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. This review critically evaluates the emerging therapeutic prospects of CRISPR-engineered CAR-T cell therapy for EBV-associated NPC. It synthesises evidence on EBV latency biology, NPC immune evasion, solid-tumour CAR-T limitations, and genome-engineering strategies including conventional CRISPR-Cas9, base editing, prime editing, and double-strand-break-sparing targeted integration. Particular attention is given to genotoxicity, chromosomal rearrangements, chromosome loss, bystander and off-target editing, manufacturing heterogeneity, and the regulatory and biological barriers that currently separate technical feasibility from NPC-specific clinical implementation. Available clinical evidence from checkpoint blockade, EBV-specific adoptive T-cell therapy, base-edited CAR-T cells in haematologic malignancy, and early CRISPR-edited T-cell trials supports the feasibility of immune and genetic redirection but does not establish efficacy of a clinically validated CRISPR-engineered CAR-T platform for NPC. Future development should prioritise surface-accessible antigen validation, fit-for-purpose selection of editing technology, genomic safety, scalable manufacturing, and biomarker-driven early-phase trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.