ArticleJournal of medical entomology2026
Evaluation of mosquito transmission of equine hepacivirus in laboratory and field studies.
Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Equine hepacivirus (EqHV) is a hepatotropic virus, closely related to human hepatitis C virus (HCV), that can cause acute or chronic infection in horses. As with HCV, transmission is thought to occur primarily through parenteral, particularly blood-borne, routes. Vertical transmission from mare to foal has been reported but appears to be uncommon. The high seroprevalence in horse populations and the occurrence of infection in isolated horses indicate efficient horizontal transmission routes exist. One such possibility is biological or mechanical transmission by arthropods, such as mosquitoes, stable flies, or ticks. Here, we conducted 2 complementary studies to evaluate the possible role of mosquitoes as EqHV biological vectors. In the laboratory, we orally exposed Aedes albopictus (Skuse) females to EqHV through artificial bloodfeeding with blood collected from 2 chronically infected horses. Mosquito samples (body, legs, and saliva) were collected at multiple time points post-exposure and tested for EqHV RNA by molecular assays. In the field, 2,138 mosquitoes were collected from New York and Florida, United States, and screened for EqHV RNA. No EqHV RNA was detected in any samples from the laboratory experiment or among field-collected mosquitoes. These findings indicate that the Ae. albopictus strain evaluated here is unlikely to serve as a biological vector of EqHV and corroborate previous negative findings in field-collected mosquitoes. Nevertheless, low infection rates may have gone undetected. Laboratory studies of additional horse-feeding mosquito species and expanded field collections in EqHV-endemic regions are needed to further clarify any potential role for mosquitoes in EqHV transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.