Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42700361›Full record

ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026

Scorpion Peptides in Antiviral Drug Discovery: An In-depth Review.

Mojtaba Memariani, Hamed Memariani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mojtaba MemarianiDepartment of Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed MemarianiDepartment of Molecular Virology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran. h_memariani@pasteur.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite remarkable progress in the fields of vaccinology and antiviral therapy, viral infections persist as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Therefore, it is crucial to identify new and effective antiviral drug candidates. Scorpion venoms are viewed as a rich source of structurally diverse and biologically active peptides, which may present opportunities for diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic applications. This review intends to provide a contemporary and detailed analysis of scorpion-derived peptides, with a particular focus on their structural diversity, cytotoxic effects, antiviral properties, and mechanisms of action. Additionally, this paper highlights several potential fruitful areas for future studies. Current evidence indicates that scorpion-derived peptides are effective against a wide array of medically important viral pathogens such as chikungunya virus, dengue virus, enterovirus 71, hepatitis B virus (HBV), herpes simplex virus 1, human immunodeficiency virus 1, influenza A virus (IAV), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, and Zika virus. Nevertheless, the majority of these findings have been obtained from in vitro studies, whereas evidence from animal models remains limited and clinical evaluation in humans is currently unavailable. Available studies suggest that these peptides may act through diverse mechanisms of action, including direct virucidal activity, inhibition of viral entry, immune system modulation, reduction of virus-induced cytopathic effects, and suppression of viral gene expression. Emerging evidence also demonstrates the efficacy of certain scorpion-derived peptides in animal models of HBV, IAV, and Newcastle disease virus infection. Overall, such peptides appear to inaugurate new avenues for the treatment of viral infections.

Indexed as

Antiviral agentsMechanism of actionPeptidesScorpionsVenoms

Identifiers

PMID42700361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.