ArticleFood science of animal resources2026
Monitoring of moisture content in meat emulsion using an SWIR hyperspectral imaging system.
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quality of meat emulsions during mixing is difficult to control because rapid, objective, and non-destructive measurement methods remain limited. This study investigated the effects of lean meat-to-fat ratio and mixing time on moisture content in meat batters using short-wave infrared (1,000-1,700 nm) hyperspectral imaging combined with chemometric modeling. Meat batters were prepared at three lean meat-to-fat ratios: Group A (6:2), Group B (5:3), and Group C (4:4), and mixed for 0, 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, and 15 min. Moisture content differed significantly among formulations, with Group A showing the highest value (63.4%), followed by Group B (57.2%) and Group C (52.4%). Mixing time also had a significant effect, with the highest moisture content observed at 0 min (61.8%) and stabilization at approximately 56-58% after 1-15 min, indicating progressive homogenization. Two-way ANOVA revealed significant main effects of lean meat-to-fat ratio and mixing time (p < 0.001), but no significant interaction. Important wavelengths were identified at 1,000-1,124, 1,190-1,230, near 1,400, and 1,600-1,700 nm, mainly related to water, fat, and protein absorptions. PLSR and Elastic Net emphasized lower water-related wavelengths, whereas RF highlighted mid- and high-wavelength regions associated with fat and protein. Among the tested models, Elastic Net with raw spectra showed the best prediction performance (R²P = 0.76, RMSEP = 2.54%), while the ensemble model also showed strong performance. In addition, hyperspectral imaging visualized moisture distribution and reduced sample heterogeneity with increased mixing time. These results suggest that SWIR hyperspectral imaging is an effective non-destructive tool for predicting moisture content and monitoring mixing uniformity in meat batters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.