Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42700317›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2026

Central nervous system and cancer: mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities CNS and cancer: a review.

Fausto Petrelli, Antonio Callea, Antonio Ghidini, Marinella Carpo, Marianna Barbuto, Donatella Gambini, Enrico Mailland, Bruno Ferraro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fausto PetrelliSC Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy. faupe@libero.it.
Antonio CalleaNeurology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy.
Antonio GhidiniOncology Unit, Casa Di Cura Igea, Milano, Italy.
Marinella CarpoNeurology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy.
Marianna BarbutoNeurology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy.
Donatella GambiniDepartment of Neurosciences, Casa Di Cura Igea, Milano, Italy.
Enrico MaillandNeurophysiopathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
Bruno FerraroNeurology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is increasingly recognized as a systemic disease whose biology is shaped by reciprocal interactions with its microenvironment, including the central and peripheral nervous systems. Recent evidence demonstrates that neural inputs can directly promote tumour growth through synaptic, paracrine, and neuroendocrine mechanisms, and that these inputs intersect with canonical drug-resistance pathways, creating new opportunities and challenges for precision oncology. Primary brain tumours such as gliomas form bona fide functional synapses with neurons, hijacking both excitatory (AMPA/NMDA) and inhibitory (GABA_A) inputs to sustain proliferation. Comparable mechanisms are now described in brain metastases and, remarkably, in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), where cortical and vagal neurons establish synaptic contacts with tumour cells. Beyond synaptic communication, paracrine neurotransmitter signalling, tumour innervation, autonomic balance (β-adrenergic versus vagal tone), and systemic stress responses jointly modulate tumour biology, immune surveillance, and therapeutic response. Convergent evidence further indicates that neural and stress-related signalling cooperates with classical resistance circuits-including p53-EGFR-ERK signalling, P-glycoprotein-mediated drug efflux, reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent redox programmes, and adipokine-Hsp90 axes-to attenuate the efficacy of chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Neuron-tumour interactions represent a novel and clinically actionable dimension of cancer pathogenesis that extends well beyond gliomas. Targeting neuron-tumour synapses, neurotransmitter pathways, autonomic inputs, and the resistance circuits with which they intersect offers new therapeutic opportunities, but translation requires careful attention to specificity, neurological safety, and rational combination with cytotoxic, targeted, and immune therapies. Cancer is not driven solely by genetic mutations; it is also shaped by signals from the nervous system. This review synthesizes how nerves and brain activity directly influence tumour growth across multiple diseases-including gliomas, small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and prostate cancer-and how these neural signals converge with metabolic and drug-resistance pathways that limit the efficacy of conventional therapy. Recent discoveries show that some cancers form direct synapse-like connections with neurons and exploit neurotransmitters to fuel tumour progression and treatment escape. Understanding these interactions opens new therapeutic opportunities-such as targeting neural signalling, autonomic pathways, or neuro-modulated resistance mechanisms-and positions the nervous system as a previously underappreciated but clinically relevant driver of cancer behaviour.

Indexed as

Central Nervous SystemNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansAutonomic nervous systemDrug resistanceNeural signallingNeuron–tumour interactionsSynaptic communicationTumour microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.