ReviewCardiovascular drugs and therapy2026
Spatiotemporal Nanotherapy After Myocardial Infarction: Targeting the Inflammatory-to-reparative Transition With Extracellular Vesicles and Engineered Nanoparticles.
Review in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePost-myocardial infarction (MI) healing is a moving sequence of injury, inflammatory clearance, resolution, vascular repair, and scar maturation. This review evaluates how extracellular vesicles (EVs), cell-derived nanovesicles, and engineered nanoparticles can be matched to these changing biological requirements.
methodsA critical narrative synthesis was organized around four approximate post-MI windows: minutes to 24 h, days 1-3, days 3-7, and after day 7. Representative mechanistic, rodent, porcine, and human studies were compared by target cell, cargo, material, release profile, route, quantitative delivery evidence, efficacy, and translational liability.
resultsEarly oxidative and microvascular injury favors brief cytoprotection and vascular targeting; the inflammatory peak favors calibrated control of recruited leukocytes while preserving debris removal; resolution favors efferocytosis, reparative immune signaling, angiogenesis, and local immunomodulation; and later remodeling favors selective rather than global antifibrotic therapy. Directly generated nanovesicles and modified-mRNA lipid nanoparticles expand the design space. However, human evidence remains sparse, and most preclinical studies use fixed schedules, young non-comorbid rodents, qualitative biodistribution, and incompletely defined potency assays.
conclusionA credible spatiotemporal product must demonstrate phase-dependent target availability, controlled exposure, target-cell cargo engagement, and reduced benefit or emerging harm with a deliberately mismatched schedule. Translation requires quantitative pharmacokinetics and biodistribution, route-specific safety, mechanism-linked potency, scalable manufacturing, and validation in reperfused comorbid large-animal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42700303What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.