ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2026
Antibody-Drug Conjugates in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
opinion statementEsophageal cancer remains one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with particularly poor outcomes following disease progression after first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a transformative therapeutic class that combines the targeting precision of monoclonal antibodies with potent cytotoxic payloads, enabling selective tumor cell killing while minimizing off-target toxicity. In the management of advanced esophageal cancer, I advocate for the integration of ADCs as a therapeutic option following progression on first-line chemoimmunotherapy. For patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, trastuzumab deruxtecan is my preferred choice based on its superior overall survival benefit and robust bystander killing effect, which also confers activity in HER2-low tumors. For HER2-negative gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 represents a promising target given its high prevalence of moderate to strong expression in nearly 80% of cases, and sacituzumab tirumotecan is currently under phase III investigation in this setting. In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, I recommend biomarker-guided selection among ADCs targeting B7-H3, given its overexpression in over 90% of cases. For Nectin-4-expressing tumors, enfortumab vedotin may be considered as a later-line alternative despite modest activity. Notably, the bispecific ADC targeting both epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 3, BL-B01D1, has demonstrated compelling efficacy in immunotherapy-refractory esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and I consider it a breakthrough option in this subtype. For claudin-18.2-positive gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, several ADCs including CMG901, IBI343, and tecotabart vedotin represent promising later-line choices. I emphasize that patient selection should be guided by validated predictive biomarkers, and treatment decisions must account for distinctive toxicity profiles, particularly interstitial lung disease with trastuzumab deruxtecan. Finally, I strongly support advancing ADCs into earlier lines of therapy and perioperative settings through well-designed clinical trials to further improve long-term outcomes in this aggressive malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42700288What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.