ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Force production with a subset of fingers: two aspects of unintentional finger involvement.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We explored the relations between unintentional finger force production (enslaving) and multi-finger force-stabilizing synergies using the framework of the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis. In particular, we formulated three mutually exclusive hypotheses on the relations between the synergy indices for the force produced by the instructed finger, enslaved fingers, and all the fingers. The subjects performed accurate force production task with two fingers of a hand (index and ring) while the visual feedback showed the force produced by all the fingers (unknown to the subjects). Synergy index reflecting inter-trial variance analysis confirmed strongest synergies stabilizing the total force and weakest synergies stabilizing the force by the enslaved fingers. Analysis of 60-s trials with and without continuous visual feedback on total force demonstrated an increase in the enslaving index. Analysis of the diffusion plots (Hurst index) confirmed larger stability along the UCM for the enslaved finger force. Overall, our results show that the traditional view on enslaving as a robust phenomenon ensuring linear relations between the intended and unintended finger forces is likely wrong: Enslaving increases with time as reflected in the smaller indices of force-stabilizing synergies. These findings also suggest that enslaving is defined predominantly by neural factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.