ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026
Near-miss dispensing errors in Japanese community pharmacies: error types and associated factors across dispensing stages.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe types and causes of dispensing errors vary across the stages of the complex dispensing process in community pharmacies. Notably, the analysis of near-miss reports may facilitate improvements in healthcare environments and operational practices.
aimWe aimed to identify the characteristics of the factors contributing to near-miss errors at each stage of the dispensing process and to determine which factors require priority action.
methodWe conducted a secondary analysis of near-miss dispensing errors voluntarily reported by community pharmacies through the near-miss reporting system of the Japan Council for Quality Health Care. The associations between various types of near-miss errors and their contributing factors were estimated using multivariate logistic regression models.
resultsAmong the 45,483 near-miss incidents, most were reported during the dispensing and accuracy-checking stages (n = 35,384, 77.8%). At the prescription data entry stage, near-miss errors were primarily associated with the usability of computer systems and look-alike/sound-alike (LASA) drug names. At the dispensing and accuracy-checking stage, the characteristic contributing factors included LASA drug names and similar appearances, patient preferences for brand name/generic, user-friendliness of equipment, and human factors among pharmacists. During the medicine supply stage, factors associated with inadequate confirmation of the patient's understanding were identified. Finally, at the post-supply stage, patient-related factors and insufficient communication were identified as key contributors.
conclusionBased on the reported near-miss events, priority actions are required to address LASA drug names and similar appearances, generic prescription systems, labour-intensive dispensing practices, the usability of computer systems and equipment, and inadequate communication with patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42700207What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.