Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42700191›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2026

Biotics in Menopausal Health: A Two-Decade Bibliometric Analysis and Narrative Review.

Femi Olawale, Sanmi E Alake, Ranjitha Chandrashekar, Yoo Kim, Winyoo Chowanadisai, Elizabeth A McCullagh, Brenda J Smith, Edralin A Lucas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Femi OlawaleDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Education and Human sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA. femi.olawale@okstate.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0698-1711
Sanmi E AlakeDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Education and Human sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Ranjitha ChandrashekarDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Education and Human sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Yoo KimDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Education and Human sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Winyoo ChowanadisaiDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Education and Human sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Elizabeth A McCullaghDepartment of Integrative Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Brenda J SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Edralin A LucasDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Education and Human sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.

Funding

NCCIH NIH HHS 1R15AT011962-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMenopause, defined as amenorrhea due to loss of ovarian function, is associated with osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, vasomotor disturbances, and cardiovascular disease. While menopause hormone therapy (MHT) remains the gold standard for high-potency symptom management, biotic interventions offer a safe, alternative approach for those who cannot or choose not to use MHT. This review examines biotic interventions (probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics) and their influence on the gut-menopause axis. RECENT

findingsDeclining estrogen during menopause alters gastrointestinal physiology, including shifts in gut microbiota composition and impaired gut barrier function. Bibliometric analysis of the past two decades shows a sharp rise in publications after 2017, peaking in 2024. The intellectual landscape centers on "probiotics," "menopause," and "osteoporosis," highlighting bone health as a key focus. Evidence indicates that biotic interventions, particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species and selected fibers, can restore microbial balance, enhance short-chain fatty acid production, improve gut barrier integrity, modulate the estrobolome, reduce systemic inflammation, and support bone, metabolic, cardiovascular, and vasomotor health. Biotic strategies represent a multi-targeted, non-hormonal approach to managing menopausal health, addressing underlying physiological changes. These findings highlight emerging research trends while underscoring the need for long-term clinical trials, and support further exploration of personalized, microbiome-targeted interventions in menopause.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMenopausePrebioticsProbioticsBibliometricsFemaleHumansSynbioticsPrebioticsMenopauseParabioticsPostbioticsPrebioticsProbioticsSynbiotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.