ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2026
Biotics in Menopausal Health: A Two-Decade Bibliometric Analysis and Narrative Review.
Review in Current nutrition reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewMenopause, defined as amenorrhea due to loss of ovarian function, is associated with osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, vasomotor disturbances, and cardiovascular disease. While menopause hormone therapy (MHT) remains the gold standard for high-potency symptom management, biotic interventions offer a safe, alternative approach for those who cannot or choose not to use MHT. This review examines biotic interventions (probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics) and their influence on the gut-menopause axis. RECENT
findingsDeclining estrogen during menopause alters gastrointestinal physiology, including shifts in gut microbiota composition and impaired gut barrier function. Bibliometric analysis of the past two decades shows a sharp rise in publications after 2017, peaking in 2024. The intellectual landscape centers on "probiotics," "menopause," and "osteoporosis," highlighting bone health as a key focus. Evidence indicates that biotic interventions, particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species and selected fibers, can restore microbial balance, enhance short-chain fatty acid production, improve gut barrier integrity, modulate the estrobolome, reduce systemic inflammation, and support bone, metabolic, cardiovascular, and vasomotor health. Biotic strategies represent a multi-targeted, non-hormonal approach to managing menopausal health, addressing underlying physiological changes. These findings highlight emerging research trends while underscoring the need for long-term clinical trials, and support further exploration of personalized, microbiome-targeted interventions in menopause.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42700191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.