Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42700152›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2026

Structural T-Cell Receptor Analysis in the Age of Machine Learning.

Nele P Quast, Matthew I J Raybould, Charlotte M Deane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nele P QuastOxford Protein Informatics Group, Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7460-8572
Matthew I J RaybouldOxford Protein Informatics Group, Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5663-5297
Charlotte M DeaneOxford Protein Informatics Group, Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-2252

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S024093/1Immunocore Ltd via SABS R3 CDT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of highly accurate deep learning models for protein structure prediction has transformed the landscape of T-cell receptor (TCR) structure data, which can now be accessed at repertoire scale. We provide a perspective on the growing field of structural TCR immunoinformatics, summarizing core principles of TCR structural biology and highlighting existing resources and tools. We outline computational methods for TCR structure prediction, and discuss outstanding challenges faced by current tools, as well as potential avenues to address these. We expand on the research enabled by the availability of predicted TCR structures, exploring the utility of TCR structure predictions for computationally inferring TCR specificity, as well as summarizing opportunities emerging from the adjacent field of antibody research. Finally, we provide a forward-looking perspective on the advances in deep learning research which have recently enabled computational design of TCRs and TCR-like binders.

Indexed as

Machine LearningReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansImmunoinformaticsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID42700152
PMCPMC13545988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.