SynthesisMedicine2026
Experiences and perceptions of lay bystanders responding to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A qualitative systematic review.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo synthesize the experiences and perceptions of lay bystanders before, during, and after responding to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.
methodsSeven English and Chinese databases were searched from their inception to July 31, 2026, supplemented with citation tracking. Two reviewers independently selected studies, appraised methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research, and extracted the findings and supporting illustrations. Unequivocal and credible findings were synthesized using JBI meta-aggregation, and confidence was assessed using confidence in the evidence from reviews of qualitative research.
resultsEight studies involving 209 participants were included. Thirty-three findings were grouped into 12 categories and 4 were synthesized findings concerning the motivators and inhibitors of response, recognition and appraisal of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, conditions facilitating or impeding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use, and post-event psychological responses and adjustment. Confidence in the evidence from reviews of qualitative research was moderate for the 1st 3 synthesized findings, and low for the 4th.
conclusionBystander response is a continuum that extends from event recognition and action to post-event adjustment. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest systems should provide realistic preparations, clear on-scene support, proportionate information, and psychological support after an event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.