ArticleMedicine2026
Association between anion gap and mortality in critically ill patients with gastrointestinal perforation: Evidence from the American MIMIC-IV and the Chinese Central-III Study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critically ill patients with gastrointestinal (GI) perforation present with complex, rapidly progressing conditions and high mortality. The impact of anion gap (AG) on mortality in these patients remains understudied, particularly across distinct geographic populations. This retrospective, multicenter cohort study analyzed 1167 critically ill patients with GI perforation from the American MIMIC-IV database (n = 552) and the Chinese Central-III cohort (n = 615). AG was measured using the first value obtained within 24 hours of intensive care unit admission. Patients were stratified by AG quartiles. Multivariable Cox regression assessed mortality risk, restricted cubic spline analysis evaluated nonlinearity, and receiver operating characteristic analysis identified optimal AG thresholds and quantified prognostic performance. Comprehensive subgroup analyses were performed. Mortality rates were comparable between cohorts (MIMIC-IV: 11.8% in-hospital, 24.6% 28-day; Central-III: 16.3% in-hospital, 24.8% 28-day). In both cohorts, the highest AG quartile showed significantly elevated mortality risk versus the lowest quartile (MIMIC-IV: aHR = 5.97 for in-hospital, aHR = 5.26 for 28-day; Central-III: aHR = 3.35 for in-hospital, aHR = 4.18 for 28-day). Restricted cubic spline revealed a consistent nonlinear AG-mortality relationship. Receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed AG's significant discriminatory power and identified optimal cutoff values in both populations. This first binational (US-China) multicenter analysis confirms that elevated AG levels independently predict increased mortality in critically ill patients with gastrointestinal perforation. The consistent findings across Western and Asian intensive care unit populations underscore AG's robustness as a readily available prognostic marker in this high-risk patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.