Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42700074›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

Analysis of endometrial histopathological classifications and associated factors in infertile women with heterogeneous endometrial echogenicity.

Saihua Ma, Rong Dong, Jiao Liu, Jingyu Xu, Baojuan Wang, Linlin Fan, Zheng Gong, Tian Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saihua MaReproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Rong DongReproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Jiao LiuReproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Jingyu XuGraduate School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Baojuan WangReproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Linlin FanReproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Zheng GongReproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Tian XiaReproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5285-0064

Funding

First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Expansion Project Fund 院 TX2025014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility is a key reproductive health challenge, with endometrial lesions as a major cause. Heterogeneous endometrial echo is an initial screening tool, and hysteroscopy plus pathology is the diagnostic gold standard. This study explored pathological subtypes, risk factors of heterogeneous echo in infertile women, and predictive models' performance. This study analyzes the histopathological classifications and associated influencing factors of endometrial tissue in infertile women with heterogeneous endometrial echogenicity identified on ultrasound. It also seeks to explore the clinical value of such echogenic patterns in diagnosing endometrial lesions, thereby providing evidence-based support for the clinical diagnosis and management of these patients. This was a cross-sectional study that enrolled infertile patients undergoing hysteroscopy due to heterogeneous endometrial echogenicity. We analyzed the histopathological classifications of the endometrium and its associated influencing factors. A total of 312 infertile women with heterogeneous endometrial echo were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data, hysteroscopic findings, and pathology results were collected. Group comparisons, Spearman correlation, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves/confusion matrices, neural network, and restricted cubic spline were used. A total of 227 (72.8%) had endometrial lesions (chronic endometritis: 175, 56.09%; polyps: 85, 27.24%; hyperplasia: 106; fibroids: 2); 85 (27.24%) were negative. Body mass index, infertility duration, and endometrial thickness correlated positively with lesions (P < .05); infertility type correlated negatively (r=-0.158, P = .005). Body mass index (BMI) and endometrial thickness were independent risk factors. The exploratory neural network analysis identified endometrial thickness as the most important predictor (normalized importance score = 0.301), followed by BMI (0.245) and age (0.229). The internally validated multivariable logistic regression model achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.701 (0.637-0.760) and the area under the precision-recall curve of 0.859 (0.808-0.902). At the Youden-optimal threshold of 0.733, sensitivity and specificity were 0.652 and 0.670, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis suggested a nonlinear association, with the estimated adjusted odds ratios increasing modestly above the 10-mm reference value. Chronic endometritis and polyps are common in these women. BMI, endometrial thickness, and infertility duration are key risk factors. BMI and endometrial thickness were independently associated with endometrial lesions, while the internally validated prediction model showed modest discrimination, emphasizing ultrasound monitoring and weight management for diagnosis/treatment.

Indexed as

EndometriumInfertility, FemaleAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEndometritisFemaleHumansHysteroscopyPolypsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveUltrasonographyendometrial heterogeneityhysteroscopyinfertilitypathological diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID42700074
PMCPMC13549591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.