Observational studyMedicine2026
Risk evaluation of neck extension in patients with degenerative or ossified cervical spine undergoing extension-dependent surgical procedures: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to establish a structured clinical flow for evaluating the risk of iatrogenic spinal cord injury in patients with cervical spine pathology undergoing surgeries requiring neck extension. We retrospectively reviewed 152 patients who underwent anterior neck surgeries requiring cervical extension between March 2022 and February 2024. All patients received preoperative cervical computed tomography (CT) to assess for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, degenerative stenosis, and other compressive pathologies. Patients with radiologic risk underwent symptom evaluation and were recommended cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Based on CT, MRI, and clinical findings, patients were stratified into risk groups, and cleared for extension, underwent intraoperative neck position modulation, or received preventive surgery. Radiologic pathology was identified in 27 patients (17.8%). MRI was performed in 10 patients; 3 showed T2 signal changes. Five patients met high-risk criteria, of whom 1 underwent preventive decompression and 4 received intraoperative position modulation. Neck extension was permitted without restriction in 134 patients (88.2%). No postoperative neurological deterioration occurred in any patient. Our proposed evaluation flow, integrating CT, MRI, and symptom-based assessment, enables safe and selective surgical planning for neck extension. Intraoperative neck position modulation may serve as a practical alternative to preventive decompression in patients with moderate risk, thereby avoiding unnecessary surgery without compromising neurological safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.