SynthesisMedicine2026
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block versus port-site local anesthetic infiltration in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a major clinical concern, and the optimal method of local anesthetic delivery is unresolved. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane (LTAP) block versus port-site local anesthetic infiltration for reducing pain, opioid use, and improving recovery in patients undergoing LC.
methodsThis review was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines and was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD420261344930). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2026, without language restriction, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LTAP block with standard port-site local anesthetic infiltration in adults undergoing LC. Eligible studies were RCTs reporting at least 1 clinically relevant outcome (postoperative pain, operative time, shoulder pain, rescue analgesia, hospital stay, or discharge within 24 hours); observational studies, non-randomized designs, and reviews were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Data were pooled using a random-effects model (Mantel-Haenszel method with DerSimonian-Laird estimation) in Review Manager version 5.4.1, with heterogeneity quantified using the I-squared statistic (heterogeneity measure).
resultsEight RCTs comprising 711 patients were included (LTAP unilateral in 2 studies, bilateral in 6). LTAP significantly reduced visual analogue scale pain scores at 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours compared with port-site infiltration, although heterogeneity was substantial for some outcomes and was reduced following sensitivity analyses. No significant differences were found between groups in operative time, shoulder pain, rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, or discharge within 24 hours, with a modest reduction in hospital stay favoring LTAP. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation certainty of evidence was high for pain at 1 and 3 hours, moderate for most secondary outcomes, and low for pain at 6 and 12 hours. Trial sequential analysis confirmed the reliability of the benefit for early pain relief and hospital stay, while several outcomes remained inconclusive.
conclusionLTAP block provides superior early postoperative analgesia compared with port-site local anesthetic infiltration after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with a modest reduction in hospital stay, although evidence for several secondary outcomes remains limited by heterogeneity and inconclusive trial sequential analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.