Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42700029›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

TabPFN-based explainable machine learning for predicting neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: A decade-long retrospective cohort study.

Yu Zhang, Hui Wang, Liping Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu ZhangDepartment of Pediatrics, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Liping Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is common in early neonatal life, and delayed recognition of high-risk infants may result in bilirubin-induced neurological injury. Prediction models based on routinely available maternal, perinatal, neonatal, and standardized laboratory variables may support early risk stratification as an adjunct to bilirubin measurement and clinical assessment. This single-center retrospective cohort included 986 neonates admitted between January 1, 2016, and March 1, 2026. The hemolytic-disease variable was excluded before preprocessing and model fitting. Admissions from 2016 through 2023 formed the development cohort (n = 776), and those from 2024 through 2026 formed a held-out temporal validation cohort (n = 210). Stability was assessed using repeated stratified 5-fold cross-validation repeated 5 times. The primary outcome was peak total bilirubin of at least 230 µmol/L during hospitalization. Only predictors documented by the predefined early-admission prediction time were used. Tabular prior-data fitted network (TabPFN) was compared with 5 conventional machine learning models. Performance included discrimination, calibration, Brier score, decision-curve analysis, bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs), and grouped permutation importance. The development and temporal validation cohorts included 468 and 54 events, respectively. Across 25 held-out development folds, TabPFN achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.997 (standard deviation [SD], 0.002), mean area under the precision-recall curve of 0.998 (SD, 0.001), and mean Brier score of 0.023 (SD, 0.009). In temporal validation, TabPFN achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.999 (95% CI, 0.997-1.000), area under the precision-recall curve of 0.997 (95% CI, 0.991-1.000), and Brier score of 0.013. At the development-derived threshold of 0.538, sensitivity was 1.000, specificity 0.981, positive predictive value 0.947, negative predictive value 1.000, and F1 score 0.973. Random forest had marginally higher temporal discrimination, whereas TabPFN had the lowest Brier score. Leading predictors were maternal disease count, abortion or preterm history, postnatal abnormality, and birth-weight category. After exclusion of the hemolytic-disease variable, TabPFN showed stable repeated-cross-validation performance and strong temporal discrimination, calibration, and clinical net benefit. These single-center findings support TabPFN as a candidate decision-support approach requiring independent multicenter validation and prospective benchmarking against standard-of-care bilirubin risk assessment.

Indexed as

Hyperbilirubinemia, NeonatalMachine LearningBilirubinFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentBilirubinexplainable artificial intelligencemachine learningneonatal hyperbilirubinemiaprediction modelretrospective cohortTabPFNtemporal validation

Identifiers

PMID42700029
PMCPMC13549573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.