ArticleMedicine2026
A case report of giant inflammatory mass in the hypopharynx.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleHypopharyngeal inflammatory masses are rare conditions that may occur in association with factors such as intubation, trauma, or reflux. Their clinical and imaging features often closely mimic those of malignant tumors, necessitating a definitive diagnosis through the histopathological examination of surgical specimens. Although surgical excision remains the primary intervention for large lesions, vigilant postoperative surveillance is imperative because of the high recurrence rates. PATIENT CONCERNS: We detail the case of a 26-year-old female admitted for a traumatic brainstem injury. Following 21 days of endotracheal intubation and over 2 months of nasogastric tube placement, flexible laryngoscopy revealed a mass in the left pyriform sinus, prompting referral to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. The patient exhibited dysphagia and mild hoarseness as her sole symptoms. DIAGNOSES: Computed tomography and neck magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a mass measuring approximately 32 mm × 27 mm at its largest cross-section, with ill-defined borders, heterogeneous density, and multiple bilateral cervical lymph nodes. Biopsy revealed inflammatory necrosis and granulation tissue.
interventionsGiven the large size of the mass, persistent dysphagia, the inability to completely exclude malignancy based on imaging findings, and limited biopsy results, complete resection was performed under general anesthesia to alleviate symptoms and establish a definitive diagnosis. Subsequent pathological examination confirmed the presence of an inflammatory mass composed of necrotic and proliferative granulation tissue. OUTCOMES: The patient recovered well after the surgical removal of the lesion. During the 4-month follow-up period, a laryngoscopy performed 11 weeks after surgery revealed no recurrence of the mass. At the final telephone follow-up at 4 months after surgery, the patient reported no throat-related symptoms. LESSONS: This case suggests that prolonged tube placement may be a potential contributing factor in the development of inflammatory masses in the pyriform sinus. In patients with a history of long-term tube placement who present with a pyriform sinus mass, inflammatory masses may be considered among the differential diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.