ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Massive rectus sheath hematoma following anticoagulation requiring operative hemorrhage control: a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rectus sheath hematoma (RSH) is an uncommon complication of anticoagulation that can rapidly progress to hemorrhagic shock and may require operative management. Presentation of case: We report a case, in accordance with the SCARE criteria, of a 75-year-old patient with acute-on-chronic lower limb ischemia who developed a Type III RSH while receiving a therapeutic heparin infusion and awaiting a delayed vascular bypass. The patient was hypotensive and developed acute tense distension of the lower abdomen. The patient was resuscitated, and computed tomography (CT) with IV contrast was performed, demonstrating a Type III RSH measuring 18.9 × 10.1 × 15.2 cm with suspected active extravasation near the pelvic side wall. Clinical discussion: Given shock physiology and an acute change on exam, the patient was taken to the operating room, where active bleeding from the inferior epigastric artery was identified. Severe RSH may be intermittently tamponaded and lack a clear angiographic target. Conclusion: In unstable patients, escalation should be driven by bedside physiology and serial examination rather than by imaging alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.