ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Referral Adherence in a Developmental/Behavioral Clinic: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Multiple studies have noted significant rates of emotional and developmental concerns in children, coupled with inconsistent rates of engagement with related services. Such inconsistency can lead to a range of negative outcomes. Our project aimed to increase the number of children who completed the intake process following referral to the Child Development Center from 57% to 80% by the end of the second quarter of 2022. Methods: The project team identified barriers to referral adherence and developed targeted interventions to address them. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles included interventions such as moving the intake process to a phone call, direct outreach to families, enhancing education on Child Development Center services, and increasing communication with referring providers. We used control charts to assess the impact of interventions. Results: Completed intakes increased from 57% to 85% within 2 months and remained between 83% and 89% for the rest of the study. Referral completion rates for children younger than 5 rose from 45% to 75% or higher. The referral completion rate did not vary by ethnicity, race, or insurance type. Although increased referral completion rate led to increased wait times for appointments, 83% of patients who completed an initial intake followed through with an appointment at the Center. Conclusions: We used a quality improvement methodology to increase the percentage of patients who completed an initial intake following referral to the Center. The use of a phone intake option and consistent seeking of feedback and collaboration with all stakeholders involved in the project contributed to its success.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.