ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Extraneural cysticercosis mimicking soft-tissue tumors: a case report from a low-resource setting.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Extraneural cysticercosis (ECC), caused by the larval stage of Case presentation: We report two clinically distinct cases of ECC at demographic extremes: a 6-year-old male with an acute intramuscular mass in the rectus abdominis, and a 65-year-old female with a 7-year history of a subcutaneous chest wall mass, both of which were clinically indistinguishable from benign tumors. Definitive diagnoses were established in both cases by histopathological examination of surgically excised specimens, which revealed the characteristic Clinical discussion: These cases underscore the diagnostic difficulty of ECC across disparate age groups (pediatric and elderly) and varying chronicity (2 weeks vs. 7 years). The first case highlighted the risk of systemic dissemination; the second demonstrated the fibrotic burnout stage. Both cases confirm histopathology as the gold standard for definitive diagnosis, particularly in resource-limited settings where advanced diagnostics are often inaccessible. Conclusion: ECC must remain a key differential diagnosis for any unexplained soft tissue mass in endemic areas. The reliance on and proficiency in histopathology are critical for definitive diagnosis. These findings serve as a public health sentinel, demanding integrated One Health strategies to interrupt
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.