ArticleJournal of sensor and actuator networks2025
EMG-Based Simulation for Optimization of Human-in-the-Loop Control in Simple Robotic Walking Assistance.
Article in Journal of sensor and actuator networks, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exoskeletons offer promising solutions for enhancing human mobility; however, personalizing assistance parameters to optimize physiological outcomes remains challenging. Human-in-the-loop (HIL) optimization has emerged as an effective strategy for tailoring device control, often using electromyography (EMG) as a real-time proxy for metabolic cost. This study simulates HIL optimization using surrogate models built from the average root mean square of the muscles' activations (EMG-RMS) derived from treadmill walking trials with a robotic waist tether. Nine surrogate models were evaluated for prediction accuracy, including gradient boosting (GB), random forest, support vector regression, and Gaussian process variants. Seven global optimization algorithms were compared based on convergence time, EMG-RMS at optimum, and efficiency metrics. GB achieved the highest predictive accuracy (1.57% RAEP). Among optimizers, the gravitational search algorithm (GSA) produced the lowest EMG-RMS value (0.17 normalized units) and the fastest convergence (0.32 s), while particle swarm optimization (PSO) achieved 0.36 EMG-RMS in 1.61 s. These findings demonstrate the value of EMG-based simulation frameworks in guiding algorithm selection for HIL optimization, ultimately reducing the experimental burden in developing personalized exoskeleton assistance strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.