ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026
The role of radiation therapy in leptomeningeal disease from breast cancer - a multicenter analysis.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A subset of breast cancer patients will eventually develop leptomeningeal disease (LMD). There is a lack of large, in-depth analyses of the pattern of care and outcomes, with a particular focus on radiation therapy (RT). We report our experience in interdisciplinary LMD management, specifically addressing the role of RT. Materials and methods: This multicenter study analyzed female breast cancer patients with LMD treated at three academic centers between 2005 and 2020. Results: A total of 232 LMD patients were included. The median age at LMD diagnosis and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) were 54.5 years and 80%, respectively. Most patients presented with LMD localized in the brain (53.8%), underwent RT (66.4%), and received systemic therapy (61.6%). One hundred fifty-four patients received 205 RT courses, with whole-brain RT used most often (120 treatments, 58.5%). With a median follow-up of 4.5 months (range 0.1-72.0 months), 220 deaths were observed. The median overall survival (OS) was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval: 3.9-5.5). RT was not associated with improved OS and showed heterogeneous interactions across clinical contexts. Systemic therapy was associated with improved OS, especially in patients with a poor KPS. Discussion: This study highlights the dismal prognosis of LMD. RT was not associated with improved OS. Our findings, along with the reviewed literature, demonstrate that determining the potential benefit of RT on OS is challenging due to interactions between treatments and their timing, underscoring the need to clarify the optimal use and timing of RT in randomized clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.