Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699655›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2026

Sentinel lymph node distribution in endometrial cancer: clinical patterns and implications from a 292-patient cohort.

Wiktor Szatkowski, Karolina W Pniewska, Małgorzata U Nowak-Jastrząb, Kamil Kisielewicz, Janusz Ryś, Tomasz Banaś, Jerzy Jakubowicz, Paweł Blecharz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wiktor SzatkowskiDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, Krakow, Poland.
Karolina W PniewskaDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, Krakow, Poland.
Małgorzata U Nowak-JastrząbDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, Krakow, Poland.
Kamil KisielewiczDepartment of Medical Physics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Division, Krakow, Poland.
Janusz RyśDepartment of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, Krakow, Poland.
Tomasz BanaśDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, Krakow, Poland.
Jerzy JakubowiczDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, Krakow, Poland.
Paweł BlecharzDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an established alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (EC). However, the anatomical variability of sentinel lymph node (SLN) locations remains incompletely characterised. This study assessed SLN distribution in a single-centre cohort and compared findings with published data. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed 292 patients with EC treated at the Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch (2016-2025). All underwent SLN mapping using technetium-99m (Tc-99m), indocyanine green (ICG), Patent Blue, or their combinations. Bilateral detection failures were managed according to an established intraoperative algorithm. SLNs were classified anatomically, and outcomes were compared across mapping techniques. Histopathological assessment included ultrastaging. Results: A total of 526 SLNs were identified (mean 1.8 per patient). The most common locations were the obturator (48.7%) and internal iliac (25.1%) regions. Bilateral detection was achieved in 87.0% of patients, unilateral in 12.0%, and no detection in 1.0%. Metastases were found in 41 SLNs (7.8%) from 34 patients (11.6%), most frequently in obturator (41.5%) and internal iliac (14.6%) nodes. The use of tracer combinations (ICG + Tc-99m or Tc-99m + Patent Blue) improved detection when preoperative Tc-99m mapping was incomplete. Para-aortic SLNs were rare (1.5%) but carried a significantly higher risk of metastasis. Conclusions: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an effective and safe method for nodal assessment in EC, with the obturator and internal iliac regions being the most frequent SLN sites. Variability in SLN locations appears to depend on mapping technique, tracer type, and surgical access. Standardization of procedures and prospective comparative studies are essential to further optimise SLNB in gynaecological oncology.

Indexed as

endometrial cancerindocyanine greenlymphatic anatomymappingmetastasessentinel lymph nodetechnetium-99mtracer combinations

Identifiers

PMID42699655
PMCPMC13544032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.