ArticleDialogues in health2026
Participatory accessibility audits as a tool for disability-inclusive health systems: Findings from two Indian states.
Article in Dialogues in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Persons with disabilities face a higher need for healthcare but face challenges accessing healthcare. Despite policy developments in India, progress towards accessibility of healthcare facilities for persons with disabilities has been slow. Methods: This study used a participatory accessibility audit approach conducted in partnership with the government authorities to evaluate disability accessibility of 35 government hospitals in the states of Madhya Pradesh and Goa in India. A checklist was developed using reference guidelines and consultations with a community advisory board. After piloting, audits were conducted by persons with disabilities recruited as field investigators with training and support provided. Results: The audits showed that while hospitals have made efforts towards physical accessibility such as through ramps, many of them were inappropriate. There were large gaps in terms of accessibility for persons with sensory impairments. After the audits, the findings were shared at the state and district levels by the auditors and research team, and action plans were co-created with government officials. Early signs of change are being seen in certain districts. Conclusion: While the study shows mixed progress towards ensuring accessibility in government hospitals, it demonstrates a model of participatory accessibility audits. Participatory audits provide a rigorous, rights-based, and scalable model for accountability and change. They have widespread transferability for improving accessibility for disability communities in diverse sectors as well as for improving access to healthcare for diverse marginalised communities. However, ensuring success of the model depends on trusted partnerships between government, disabled people's organisations, health providers and researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.