Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699636›Full record

ReviewReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2026

A systematic review: management of radiation-induced moist desquamation.

Sneha Raja, Sujatha Kuppusamy, Christian Gnanaraj Johnson, Jayasutha Jayram, Satish Srinivas Kondaveeti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sneha RajaSri Ramachandra Faculty of Pharmacy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sujatha KuppusamySri Ramachandra Faculty of Pharmacy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Christian Gnanaraj JohnsonDepartment of Noi Naadal, National Institute of Siddha, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jayasutha JayramSri Ramachandra Faculty of Pharmacy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Satish Srinivas KondaveetiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in cancer treatment, but is frequently correlated with acute cutaneous toxicity, particularly in patients with head, neck, and breast cancers. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of interventions for managing grade III moist desquamation among various cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Materials and methods: A total of 676 studies were screened, and 10 randomised controlled trials were analysed based on inclusion criteria. Results: Interventions such as Mepitel Film, boron-based gel, and 0.1% Mometasone Furoate demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing the incidence and severity of moist desquamation compared to standard creams or placebo. Hydroactive colloid gels and aloe vera showed promise in alleviating symptoms and improving treatment adherence. Betamethasone effectively reduced grade 2 dermatitis but limitedly impacted severe grade 3 reactions. Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to individual patient needs and emphasize the need for further studies to validate treatments, explore long-term outcomes, and improve patient quality of life during radiotherapy.

Indexed as

boron-based gelhydroactive gelMepitel Filmmoist desquamationmometasone furoateradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42699636
PMCPMC13544027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.