ArticleLanguage teaching research2026
Instructional Practices for Signed Literacy: Observations of 38 Deaf Education Classrooms.
Article in Language teaching research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This mixed-methods study examined how signed literacy instruction is currently taught in United States deaf education classrooms (PreK-3) and to what extent that instruction reflects evidence-based composing instruction. Signed literacy instruction means teaching students to view, analyze, and compose texts in a signed language. A composing-forward approach treats students' production of signed texts as the central instructional activity, with language skills taught in service of that composition. This approach is the core of Strategic and Interactive Signing Instruction (SISI), a pedagogical framework for signed literacy. Participants were 38 teachers across 11 deaf education programs. Each teacher completed a survey on their instructional practices and was observed teaching lessons selected to demonstrate support for deaf children's signing skills. Survey and observation data were analyzed separately, then compared for agreement, complementarity, and divergence. Nine of 38 teachers included signed composition in their observed instruction. Of those 9, only 6 (16% of the full sample) met the evidence-based composing instruction threshold. These 6 teachers consistently treated signed language as the instructional target and embedded strategy, interactive, and language instruction within a composing cycle. The remaining teachers taught isolated grammatical features in signed language or used signed language to scaffold print literacy. Findings suggest that signed composition appears in a minority of classrooms, and that even when it appears, it is not consistently taught with the instructional features evidence suggests it requires.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.