ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Integrated veterinary practices and farm performance of small ruminants.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small ruminant production contributes directly to SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) and SDG 1 (No Poverty). This study examines the impact of veterinary and ethnoveterinary practices on small ruminant farm performance. Using primary data from 400 smallholder farmers and applying a multinomial endogenous switching regression model, the study estimates the effects of integrated veterinary and ethnoveterinary medicinal practices on herd size, mortality rates, and net farm income. The results indicate that joint adoption of ethnoveterinary and conventional veterinary practices yields superior performance outcomes relative to exclusive reliance on either system. Specifically, the results reveal that treating small ruminants with veterinary medicinal practices (VM) in isolation increased herd size by 24 % (5 animals) as compared to 28 % (6 animals) when VM is combined with ethnoveterinary medicinal practices (EVM). Joint adoption of EVM and VM was found to significantly reduce ruminant mortality rate by 9 % per year, and improved net farm income by 72 % relative to sole usage of VM, which reduces mortality rate by 7 % and increases farm net income by 27 %. Counterfactual estimates further reveal that non-adopters would have achieved significantly higher productivity and income levels under joint adoption. The findings underscore the complementarities between indigenous knowledge systems and formal veterinary services. Policy efforts aimed at strengthening small ruminant productivity should therefore promote integrative animal health strategies through extension training, institutional support, and inclusive service delivery models. By demonstrating the performance-enhancing effects of hybrid animal health systems, this study contributes to the literature on sustainable livestock management and inclusive agricultural transformation in sub-Saharan Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.