ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Model-based cardiac field artefact correction for OP-MEG.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Each heartbeat creates an electro-magnetic field that propagates throughout the body and is superimposed on measured brain activity in electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings. Being several orders of magnitude larger than a typical evoked response in the brain, the Cardiac Field Artefact (CFA) is especially problematic in studies where cortical activity time locked to the cardiac cycle is of interest, such as in interoception research. In this work, we develop a model-based CFA correction method, which exploits the fact that the magnetic field propagates relatively evenly through the mostly diamagnetic tissue of the human body, and that in studies using wearable optically pumped magnetometers (OP-MEG), participants are free to rotate their head. Free head rotation decouples the heart's magnetic field from that of the brain, allowing for the creation of a cardiac dipole moment (CDM) estimate, that is, an estimate of the electrical current flow in the heart, which is minimally confounded by concurrent neuronal activity in the brain. We show in simulations that, given information about the relative position and orientation of head and chest, this CDM estimate can be used to predict and correct the sensor-level CFA by dynamically accounting for the spatial relationship between heart, brain, and sensors. We further provide an empirical proof-of-principle demonstration of the pipeline in a single participant using recordings with intermittent head movement, tracked by optical motion capture, as well as an established auditory response paradigm with well-characterized response pattern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.