Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699504›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2026

A systematic review and evaluation framework for IoB-based adaptive health coaching systems.

P W C Prasad, Daniel Patricko Hutabarat, Md Shohel Sayeed, Golam Md Mohiuddin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P W C PrasadInternational School, Duy Tan University, Danang, Vietnam.
Daniel Patricko HutabaratDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Md Shohel SayeedCentre for Intelligent Cloud Computing, CoE for Advanced Cloud, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.
Golam Md MohiuddinFaculty of Information Science and Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The convergence of the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and behavioural analytics has contributed to the emergence of the Internet of Behaviours (IoB) as a framework for personalized and context-aware digital health interventions. This study systematically reviews and synthesizes the architectures, sensing technologies, behavioural analytics methods, machine learning approaches, intervention strategies, and evaluation practices underlying IoB-enabled adaptive health coaching systems. Methods: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted across IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and ACM Digital Library. A total of 75 eligible peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025 met the predefined eligibility criteria and were included in the final evidence synthesis. Results: The synthesis identified wearable and multimodal sensing, edge cloud architectures, AI-driven behavioural modelling, and just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) as recurring technological and intervention components. Comparatively stronger empirical support was observed for continuous monitoring, behavioural and physiological pattern recognition, remote patient monitoring, elderly care, and selected chronic disease applications. In contrast, evidence for advanced adaptive coaching, digital twins, metaverse-enabled healthcare, behavioural simulation, and emerging AI or large language model (LLM) enabled systems was more heterogeneous and frequently derived from prototype, simulation-based, or early-stage evaluations. Across the evidence base, substantial variation was observed in study designs, populations, datasets, intervention types, validation settings, and outcome measures, limiting direct cross-study comparison and conclusions regarding comparative effectiveness. Key limitations included insufficient longitudinal and clinical validation, incomplete reproducibility, fragmented interoperability, heterogeneous evaluation metrics, and unresolved privacy and governance challenges. Discussion: Based on recurring architectural, technological, and methodological patterns identified across the included studies, this review proposes a synthesized reference architecture and evaluation framework for IoB enabled adaptive health coaching. These evidence-informed conceptual synthesis frameworks are intended to guide future research and implementation rather than serve as universally validated standards. Future research should prioritize longitudinal and multi-site validation, representative datasets, reproducible reporting, interoperable clinical integration, privacy-preserving analytics, and the combined evaluation of technical, behavioural, and clinically meaningful outcomes.

Indexed as

behavioural analyticsedge computingeldercarehealth coachingIoBpersonalizationwearables

Identifiers

PMID42699504
PMCPMC13543663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.